How to Write a Research Paper for a SCOPUS or UGC CARE Journal — A Step-by-Step Guide for Humanities Scholars in India

Writing a research paper for a SCOPUS or UGC CARE journal is a specific skill. It is not the same as writing a thesis chapter, a conference paper, or an extended essay. Journals have precise expectations — about argument structure, evidence, originality, citation, and length — and papers that do not meet these expectations are rejected at the desk, before they even reach a reviewer. This guide walks you through every stage of writing a publication-ready research paper, with specific guidance for scholars in English Literature, Sociology, Management, History, and other humanities disciplines.

Before You Write: The Two Questions Every Paper Must Answer

Reviewers and editors evaluate manuscripts against two fundamental questions. If your paper cannot answer both clearly, it will be rejected regardless of how well it is written.

Question 1: What is the original contribution?

Your paper must add something to existing scholarship that is not already there. This does not mean a groundbreaking discovery. It means a specific, argued position on a specific question that existing scholarship has not answered in this way. For a humanities scholar, this might be: a new reading of a canonical text through a contemporary theoretical lens; a comparison that has not been made before; an argument about a neglected author, text, or tradition; or an application of a theoretical framework to a regional or Indian context where it has not previously been applied.

Question 2: Why does this journal’s audience need to read it?

Every journal has a specific audience — English literary scholars, sociologists working on a particular problem, management researchers in a specific context. Your paper must be addressed to that audience, use their theoretical vocabulary, and engage with the scholarship they recognise. A paper submitted to the wrong journal is rejected not because it is bad but because it is irrelevant to that journal’s readers.

Settle both questions before you write a word of the manuscript.

The Structure of a Humanities Research Paper

The structure below is the standard for humanities journals. Some journals use slightly different section names but the content requirements are the same.

Title

The title should be specific and informative. It should indicate the subject, the argument, and the scope. Avoid vague titles like “A Study of Identity in Postcolonial Fiction.” Prefer something like “Fractured Selfhood in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness: A Reading Through Homi Bhabha’s Third Space.”

A good title also includes the key terms that researchers in your field will search for — this affects discoverability in databases like SCOPUS and Google Scholar.

Abstract

The abstract is the most important part of the paper for getting past the desk. Editors read the abstract first. If it does not immediately convey an original contribution and a clear argument, the paper is rejected.

A strong humanities abstract covers five things in 200–300 words:

The research problem and why it matters
The theoretical framework or methodology you use
The specific texts, contexts, or data you analyse
Your main argument or finding
The contribution to the field

Write the abstract last, after the full paper is complete. This ensures the abstract accurately reflects the actual paper rather than what you hoped the paper would say.

Keywords

Select 5–7 keywords. Include: the theoretical framework (e.g., postcolonialism, feminist theory, critical discourse analysis), the subject area (e.g., English Literature, Indian sociology), the specific text or context studied, and 1–2 broad disciplinary terms. Keywords determine how your paper appears in searches — choose them to be found by the researchers you want to reach.

Introduction

The introduction does four things:

Establishes the research context and the significance of the topic
Reviews the most relevant existing scholarship briefly — identifying the gap
States your argument clearly and specifically
Previews the structure of the paper

The introduction should be 400–600 words for a standard humanities paper. The argument statement — sometimes called the thesis statement — should appear by the end of the first or second paragraph. Reviewers look for it. If they cannot find it, they assume the paper lacks a clear argument.

Common mistake: Beginning with broad, historical context (“Since the dawn of literature…” or “English literature has always been…”). Begin with the specific research problem instead.

Literature Review

The literature review situates your paper within existing scholarship. For a journal article, this is more focused than a thesis literature review. It should:

Cover the most significant and recent scholarship directly relevant to your argument
Identify the specific gap your paper addresses
Demonstrate that you know the field

For a 6,000-word humanities paper, the literature review is typically 800–1,200 words. It is not a summary of every paper ever written on the topic — it is a selective, argued map of the scholarly conversation you are entering.

Cite recent work. Journals want to see engagement with scholarship from the last 10 years. Older foundational texts are appropriate as anchors, but they should be supplemented by current work.

Theoretical Framework / Methodology

For humanities papers, this section explains the analytical lens you are using — the theory, the critical approach, or the interpretive methodology. For a paper on postcolonial literature, this section explains which theorist you are drawing on and how their framework applies to your analysis. For a sociological paper, it explains your research design and analytical method.

This section matters because reviewers need to assess whether your approach is appropriate and rigorous. A paper that applies a theoretical framework without explaining it, or that applies it inconsistently, will be rejected even if the analysis is otherwise strong.

Analysis and Discussion

This is the core of the paper — the section that does the actual intellectual work. For humanities scholars, this is where close reading, textual analysis, contextual argument, or empirical interpretation happens.

Principles for strong analysis:

Every claim must be supported by specific evidence — quotations from primary texts, data, examples
Move from evidence to argument, not from argument to evidence as an afterthought
Engage with other scholars’ positions — agree, disagree, complicate, extend
Be specific: “this scene demonstrates alienation” is weak; “the use of passive voice in the dialogue of this scene enacts the protagonist’s structural powerlessness within the colonial economy” is strong
Maintain the argument throughout — every paragraph should connect to the central claim stated in the introduction

For a 6,000-word paper, this section is typically 2,500–3,500 words.

Conclusion

The conclusion restates the paper’s main contribution — what you have argued and why it matters. It should:

Briefly summarise the argument (not repeat it)
State the contribution to the field explicitly
Note limitations of the study honestly
Suggest directions for future research

The conclusion is not a place for new evidence or new arguments. It is the paper’s final word on what it has done.

References

Format your references exactly to the journal’s required citation style. This is non-negotiable. An MLA-formatted bibliography submitted to a journal that uses Chicago will be rejected at the desk. Read the author guidelines and follow them precisely.

Commonly used citation styles in Indian humanities journals: MLA (English Literature), APA (Social Sciences, Education, Psychology), Chicago/Turabian (History, some Social Sciences). Check the journal’s guidelines before you begin writing so you can format as you go.

The Checklist Before Submission

Run through this before sending any manuscript to a journal.

The Most Common Reasons Humanities Papers Are Rejected

The Thesis Guide has reviewed hundreds of manuscripts before submission and reviewed peer reviewer feedback on rejected papers. The patterns are consistent.

No clear original argument. The paper describes, summarises, or explains — but does not argue a specific position. This is the single most common reason for rejection from SCOPUS-quality journals.

Wrong journal. The paper is well-written but irrelevant to the journal’s specific scope. Avoidable with proper journal research.

Inadequate engagement with recent scholarship. The literature review cites only foundational texts from 20–30 years ago. Journals want to see engagement with current debates.

Inconsistent application of theoretical framework. The introduction promises a Foucauldian reading; the analysis uses Bourdieu’s framework instead. Reviewers notice.

Plagiarism above the threshold. A similarity score above 20% will result in automatic rejection at most journals, and investigation for academic misconduct at some.

Poor academic English. For scholars writing in a second language, this is a genuine barrier. The solution is expert editing before submission — not attempting to write without support.

Need Help Writing Your Research Paper?

The Thesis Guide has helped over 200 PhD scholars in English Literature, Sociology, Management, History, and related humanities subjects write research papers that have been published in SCOPUS and UGC CARE journals. The service is humanities-only, consultation-first, and delivered in 20 days from payment confirmation.

If you have completed your research but the writing is the obstacle — or if your paper has been rejected and you need a serious revision — a free consultation is the first step.

Request Your Free Consultation →

Explore more resources for PhD scholars on our blog.

Research Paper Writing Services in India — What to Look For, What to Avoid →